The Trust Layer for AI agents
AI makes claims.
We verify them.
Check AI outputs against your policies, SOPs and domain knowledge. Get a result you can trace to the source, the rule and its version.
One claim. A check you can inspect.
A plausible answer can still disagree with policy. Verify the specific claim against authoritative knowledge, and keep the evidence for the result.
Change the claim
Illustrative checkRecords retention policy
“Retain support records for 90 days.”
POL-014 / §4.2 / v3.0Support records must be retained for 30 days.
Check: the statement against the cited source.Contradicted
30 days ≠ 90 days
The proposed duration disagrees with the cited policy.
POL-014 · §4.2 · v3.0The claim is checked. The agent owns the next action.
Example data; deterministic comparison, no live API call.A trust layer in your existing stack.
CogniSwitch verifies claims. Your agent decides what happens next. Keep your models and orchestration; add governed knowledge and verification where the workflow needs them.
Explore the architectureYour application
The workflow and its decisions.
Your agents & models
Retrieval, generation and orchestration.
CogniSwitch
Claims checked against governed knowledge. Results returned with evidence.
Claims in → verification + evidence outYour knowledge foundation
Policies, SOPs and domain documents, with their sources and versions.
Start where trust breaks.
Conflicting sources, policy gaps, unverified outputs and manual audits need different interventions. Use the capability your workflow needs.
Clarity
Source-backed knowledgeFind conflicting, incomplete or outdated knowledge before an agent retrieves it.
Align
Policy gap analysisCompare external policies with internal SOPs and surface the gaps.
Rails
Runtime verificationCheck proposed outputs against domain knowledge and SOP constraints.
Audit
Independent verificationVerify claims and preserve the supporting evidence for review.
In practice / First Stop Health
Clinical QA, with the evidence attached.
At First Stop Health, CogniSwitch checks visit transcripts against clinical QA rubrics and returns assessments with supporting evidence.
Read the clinical QA case studyA criterion you can inspect.
The clinical rubric sets the standard for the assessment.
Evidence you can review.
The assessment stays connected to the supporting transcript evidence.